Deutsch: Prüfer / Español: Evaluador / Português: Avaliador / Français: Évaluateur / Italiano: Valutatore

In the quality management context, an assessor refers to a professional who evaluates the conformity and effectiveness of an organization's quality management system (QMS) against specified quality standards. Assessors are critical in ensuring that organizations meet or exceed the quality standards required by industry regulations, certifications, or customer expectations. They play a key role in the audit process, whether for internal audits conducted by the organization itself or for external audits carried out by third-party certification bodies.

General Description

Assessors examine the documentation, processes, and practices of an organization's QMS to verify compliance with standards such as ISO 9001, ISO 14001, or sector-specific standards like AS9100 for aerospace. They assess the effectiveness of the QMS in achieving the organization's quality objectives, identify areas for improvement, and recommend corrective actions to address any non-conformities found during the audit.

Areas of Application

  • Certification Audits: Conducting assessments to determine if an organization's QMS meets the criteria for certification under international or industry-specific quality standards.
  • Internal Quality Audits: Performing evaluations as part of an organization's internal audit program to maintain and improve the QMS.
  • Supplier Audits: Assessing suppliers' and subcontractors' quality management practices to ensure they meet the organization's quality requirements.
  • Compliance Audits: Evaluating the adherence of the QMS to legal, regulatory, and contractual requirements.

Well-Known Examples

  • An ISO 9001 assessor conducting a certification audit to verify an organization's compliance with quality management principles.
  • A quality manager within a manufacturing company acting as an internal assessor to evaluate the effectiveness of the QMS and identify areas for improvement.


Ineffective assessment can lead to incorrect conclusions about the state of an organization's QMS, potentially overlooking significant non-conformities or areas requiring improvement. This can result in failed audits, loss of certification, or quality failures that negatively impact customer satisfaction and business performance.


To ensure effective assessments, it is essential for assessors to:

  • Have comprehensive training and certification relevant to the quality standards they are assessing.
  • Maintain objectivity and independence to provide unbiased evaluations.
  • Stay updated on the latest developments in quality management standards and practices.
  • Utilize effective communication skills to clearly report findings and recommendations.


Assessors in the quality management context are vital for evaluating the compliance and effectiveness of an organization's QMS. Through thorough and objective assessment, they help organizations identify areas for improvement, ensure compliance with quality standards, and maintain certifications that are crucial for operational excellence and competitive advantage.

You have no rights to post comments

Related Articles

Nonconformity ■■■■■■■■■■
Nonconformity in the context of quality management refers to a deviation from specified requirements, . . . Read More
Indication ■■■■■■■■■
Indication may refer to a synonym for sign or a valid reason to use a certain test, medication, procedure, . . . Read More
Simulation ■■■■■■■■■
Deutsch: Simulation / Español: Simulación / Português: Simulação / Français: Simulation / Italiano: . . . Read More
Progression ■■■■■■■■■
Progression in the quality management context refers to the continuous improvement and development process . . . Read More
Modification ■■■■■■■■■
Modification in the context of quality management refers to the process of making changes or adjustments . . . Read More
Container ■■■■■■■■■
In the quality management context, container refers to a system or process designed to hold, manage, . . . Read More
Normalisation ■■■■■■■■■
In the quality management context, normalisation refers to the process of establishing standards and . . . Read More
Evaluation at■■■■■■■■■
Evaluation is a systematic determination of a subject's merit, worth and significance, using criteria . . . Read More
Recipient ■■■■■■■■■
In the context of quality management, a recipient refers to an individual, group, or organization that . . . Read More
Validity ■■■■■■■■■
Validity in the quality management context refers to the extent to which a process, system, tool, or . . . Read More